Our agricultural law practice is built around the realities of working farms and rural businesses, not abstract legal theory.
We stay actively involved with our clients as operations grow, change, or face unexpected legal pressure, providing guidance that fits how agricultural businesses actually function.
Agriculture law often overlaps with business law, land use, and regulatory compliance, which means legal decisions in one area can affect the entire operation.

Our law firm is committed to helping clients address issues early, before they disrupt production, land use, or long-term planning.
When disputes arise, we step in with a clear strategy focused on protecting the farm, the business, and the relationships tied to it.
Across each practice area, our goal is to support stability, continuity, and informed decision-making for the future of the operation.
Agricultural Contracts and Farm Business Agreements
Contracts sit under most modern farm operations, even when the relationship feels informal.
USDA’s Economic Research Service reports that in 2020, agricultural contracts governed about 33% of U.S. farm commodity production by value, reflecting how often pricing, delivery, inputs, and performance standards are set by agreement rather than a simple cash sale.
In Ohio, contracts also shape everyday farm business decisions like leasing ground, sharing equipment, storing grain, or hiring services, and a weak contract can turn a routine season into a dispute.
Ohio State University Extension materials on farmland leases stress that written agreements force both sides to spell out responsibilities and expectations, which reduces conflict later.
Common agricultural contracts and agreements we help with include:
- Farmland leases, including cash rent, crop-share, and flexible arrangements
- Written lease components and documentation for longer-term arrangements
- Custom farming, application, and service agreements (planting, spraying, harvesting, manure hauling)
- Production contracts and grower agreements for livestock and specialty production
- Grain storage, delivery, and marketing agreements, including quality specs and pricing formulas
- Equipment use, shared labor arrangements, and joint operating understandings within farm partnerships
- Dispute resolution clauses, including when contracts call for mediation or arbitration rather than court (and what that means in practice)
A strong agreement does more than describe the deal.
It assigns responsibility for the things that cause the most conflict, like maintenance, access, timing, payment triggers, insurance, and what happens when conditions change.
When a disagreement develops, a well-built contract also creates leverage for negotiation and a clear record for litigation, mediation, or arbitration if the matter cannot be resolved informally.
Farmland Leasing, Ownership, and Real Estate Transactions
Farmland is often the most valuable real property a farm family or agribusiness will ever own, and small legal details can change what that land is worth and what it can be used for.
Many Ohio operations also rely on leased ground, and USDA data from the 2022 Census of Agriculture shows that 39% of U.S. farmland is rented or leased, which tracks with how commonly leasing shapes production decisions and long-term stability.
Our law firm supports clients through transactional work involving farm purchases and sales, lease drafting and enforcement, easements and access rights, and deal structures that protect the land’s usability over time.
For many clients, tax treatment is also part of the transaction, and Ohio’s CAUV framework is defined by statute in ORC 5713.30, which affects whether land is treated as “devoted exclusively to agricultural use” for valuation purposes.
When conflicts arise during or after a deal, we step in early to address boundary, access, and lease disputes with a strategy grounded in the documents and the real-world way the land is used.
Land Use, Zoning, and Agricultural Exemptions in Ohio
Land use disputes often begin at the local level.
A township zoning inquiry, a county notice, or a neighbor complaint can quickly place a farm’s buildings, access points, or expanding operations under scrutiny.
Ohio law limits how townships and counties may regulate agricultural land, but those limits depend on how the land and structures are actually used.
The question is rarely abstract, it is whether the activity qualifies as agricultural under Ohio law and whether any exceptions apply.
Ohio statutes restrict local zoning authority over agricultural uses and structures that are incident to agriculture.
Township zoning provisions generally may not prohibit agricultural uses or require zoning certificates for qualifying agricultural buildings, and county zoning law follows a similar framework.
In practice, disputes arise around activities that fall near the line, such as agritourism operations, farm markets, event traffic, parking, signage, or mixed-use buildings.
Attorney General opinions and Ohio State University Farm Office guidance reflect that the agricultural exemption has limits and must be applied to the specific facts of each situation.
Land use issues also intersect with infrastructure and development.
Road projects, utility corridors, and other public improvements can trigger eminent domain concerns that affect access, drainage, and long-term use of agricultural property.
Addressing these matters early can prevent operational disruption and preserve land value.
Ohio laws and frameworks commonly involved in agricultural land use matters include:
- ORC 519.21, limiting township zoning authority over agricultural uses and qualifying structures
- ORC 303.21, providing similar limits on county rural zoning authority
- ORC 901.80, defining agritourism and shaping how public-facing farm activities are treated
Our law firm assists clients with evaluating agricultural exemptions, responding to zoning enforcement, reviewing local ordinances, and addressing related easement or access issues.
When land use conflicts cannot be resolved through administrative channels, we represent clients in dispute resolution and litigation with a focus on protecting the operation and keeping the land usable.
Agritourism Operations and Liability Protection
Agritourism can add meaningful revenue to a working farm, but bringing the public onto agricultural property changes the risk profile overnight.
Ohio has a specific agritourism immunity statute, and it can limit liability for injuries or deaths that result from the inherent risks of agritourism activities when the operation meets the law’s requirements.
One of the most important requirements is the statutory warning sign, with prescribed language and formatting, posted at entrances or near the activity areas.
Even with immunity tools available, agritourism still raises real exposure tied to premises conditions, animal interactions, equipment, crowd flow, and emergency response planning, and those issues can become expensive quickly if they are ignored.
Our law firm helps agritourism operators set up the legal foundation that supports safe public-facing operations, including risk planning, document review, and early response when a claim or incident occurs.
Solar, Wind, and Energy Leases on Agricultural Land
Energy leasing has become a central land use issue across Ohio, especially where large, flat tracts of farmland sit near transmission.
Ohio’s utility scale solar market grew quickly, a recent Ohio solar development white paper reports that by mid 2025 the Ohio Power Siting Board had approved over 8,800 MW of utility scale solar, with over 3,800 MW operational and about 1,200 MW under construction.
Long term leases tied to these projects can control land for decades, and that can affect a farm’s future plans, resale options, drainage patterns, and how surrounding parcels function.
Ohio law also matters here because projects at a certain size trigger state level siting rules and local review steps, which can change the leverage landowners have at different points in the process.
Ohio laws and regulatory frameworks that shape these deals include:
- ORC 4906.01, which defines a “major utility facility” and applies to large solar projects designed for, or capable of, 50 MW or more, along with certain transmission facilities
- Senate Bill 52 county review process, which requires a public meeting and gives county commissioners authority to adopt a resolution that can prohibit or reduce a proposed project, and that resolution is binding on the OPSB
- County “restricted area” authority under SB 52, allowing counties to designate areas where utility scale solar projects are prohibited, including limits on certain material amendments in those areas
- ORC 4906.13(B) preemption language, which limits additional local approvals for construction or initial operation of a major utility facility authorized by an OPSB certificate
Our law firm helps landowners and agricultural businesses treat energy leases as real property deals, not routine rental paperwork.
That includes reviewing term length, renewal rights, easements, access routes, drainage and tile protection, construction impacts, decommissioning obligations, and the security behind restoration promises.
We also advise on how private lease terms interact with county review, restricted areas, and state siting timelines, so the transaction matches the landowner’s long-term goals.
Environmental Compliance for Farms and Livestock Operations
Environmental compliance in Ohio agriculture is often less about day-to-day paperwork and more about what happens when something changes, an operation expands, a neighbor complains, or an agency asks questions.
Rules tied to manure, fertilizer, and water quality can apply differently depending on location and the type of operation, and the consequences can escalate quickly if a situation is handled informally.
In Northwest Ohio, nutrient management issues can be especially sensitive because Ohio law restricts certain surface applications of manure and fertilizers containing nitrogen and phosphorus in the Western Lake Erie Basin under specified soil and weather conditions.
Large livestock and poultry operations face an additional layer of oversight, and the Ohio Department of Agriculture’s Division of Livestock Environmental Permitting regulates the construction and operation of the state’s largest facilities, including how manure, wastewater, and nutrients are managed.
Compliance work also shows up through training and certification requirements. Ohio law requires certification to apply fertilizer for purposes of agricultural production, with rule-based requirements that can affect who may apply and under what conditions.
For some operations, compliance questions also overlap with federal permitting, site planning, and water-related concerns that touch drainage, runoff, and water rights in practical terms, even when the underlying issue begins as an operational decision.
Ohio laws and regulatory frameworks that often matter in farm and livestock compliance include:
- ORC 905.321, fertilizer applicator certification requirements for agricultural production
- ORC 905.326, restrictions on certain fertilizer applications in the Western Lake Erie Basin
- ORC 939.08, restrictions on certain manure applications in the Western Lake Erie Basin
- ORC Chapter 903, Ohio’s concentrated animal feeding facility program and permitting framework
- OAC Chapter 901:10, rules administered through Ohio’s livestock environmental permitting program
- ODA fertilizer and manure guidance, which consolidates key statutory references and program expectations
- OSU Extension guidance on WLEB restrictions, explaining the surface-application limits and potential civil penalties
Agricultural Business Formation, Governance, and Transitions
Many farms operate as a family business, but the legal structure behind that business often lags behind how the operation actually runs.
Informal ownership, undocumented loans, and unclear authority can create problems when land is bought or sold, when new partners join, or when a lender or insurer needs clear documentation.
Business formation work in agriculture often involves separating real property ownership from the operating company, so land, equipment, and liability do not all sit in the same place.
Governance matters just as much as formation, especially when multiple family members work in the business or when off-farm heirs have ownership interests but no operational role.
Transition planning is rarely a single event, it is a series of decisions about control, compensation, buyouts, and how the farm continues after a key owner steps back.
These issues can also surface suddenly through conflict, including business divorces where the underlying dispute is control of assets, labor, and decision-making power.
Our law firm helps clients structure agricultural businesses in a way that supports day-to-day operations and reduces the chance that internal conflict disrupts planting, harvest, or long-term land stewardship.
When a transition is underway, we focus on agreements and governance tools that protect continuity and preserve the value built into the operation.
Agricultural Disputes, Neighbor Conflicts, and Litigation
Agricultural disputes in Ohio often start as practical disagreements, then escalate because land, timing, and long-term relationships are on the line.
A conflict may begin between neighbors or business partners, but it can quickly pull in zoning officials, insurers, lenders, or regulatory agencies.
Ohio law also shapes how these cases are fought, including Ohio’s Right to Farm law, which can serve as a defense to nuisance lawsuits tied to noise, dust, or odors when the statutory conditions are met.
When the dispute involves fencing, Ohio’s partition fence statute provides a framework for responsibilities and cost allocation between adjoining landowners.
Our law firm represents clients through negotiation and formal dispute resolution when necessary, with a focus on protecting operations and preventing a conflict from disrupting an entire season.
Common disputes, conflicts, and litigation matters include:
- Nuisance claims involving odor, noise, dust, flies, or other complaints tied to agricultural activity (including Right to Farm defense analysis)
- Boundary, access, and easement disputes involving farm roads, field access points, or recorded restrictions
- Landlord-tenant disputes over farmland leases, termination, damages, repairs, and access during planting or harvest
- Farm business disputes, including partnership breakups and “business divorces” involving control, labor, and asset division
- Drainage, ditch, and water flow conflicts, including disputes that intersect with county ditch law or Soil and Water Conservation District processes
- Fence disputes under Ohio partition fence law, including maintenance, cost allocation, and reimbursement claims
- Zoning enforcement and land use conflicts where the agricultural exemption is disputed or narrowed by local interpretation
Not every dispute belongs in court, but every dispute benefits from a clear legal strategy.
We often start by documenting the facts, reviewing the governing agreements and property records, and identifying the leverage points that drive settlement.
If litigation, mediation, or arbitration becomes necessary, our law firm represents clients with a practical approach that keeps operational continuity and long-term land value at the center of the case.