Ohio personal injury laws are not contained in a single personal injury statute.
An Ohio personal injury case may instead be governed by provisions of the Ohio Revised Code, Ohio court decisions, the Rules of Civil Procedure, insurance regulations, and statutes that apply to specific types of claims.
Most personal injury claims are based on negligence, but other legal theories may apply depending on how the injury occurred.
A case may involve statutory liability, strict liability, product liability, medical malpractice, premises liability, wrongful death, or another basis for recovery.
The applicable law can affect what the injured party must prove, the defenses available to the defendant, the damages that may be recovered, and the deadline for filing a lawsuit.
Common personal injury cases in Ohio include:
- Car, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian accidents
- Falls and other premises liability claims
- Dog bite claims
- Defective products and medical devices
- Medical malpractice
- Nursing home negligence
- Hazardous or toxic chemicals exposure claims
- Serious and catastrophic injuries
- Wrongful death
More than one area of law can apply to the same claim.
For example, a person injured in a car accident may need to consider Ohio negligence law, comparative fault, insurance coverage, the applicable statute of limitations, and damages rules before resolving the claim or filing a lawsuit.
What Must You Prove in an Ohio Personal Injury Case?
For an ordinary negligence claim, the injured party generally must establish that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and proximately caused the injury and resulting damages.
How those elements apply depends on the circumstances.
A driver may breach a duty by violating a traffic law or failing to use reasonable care.
A property owner may be responsible for certain dangerous conditions, while medical negligence claims are governed by separate standards applicable to healthcare providers.
Evidence is needed to establish both liability and damages.
Depending on the claim, an Ohio personal injury attorney may gather evidence such as photographs, video, witness statements, accident reports, maintenance records, medical records, medical bills, wage documentation, and expert opinions.
The fact that someone was injured does not by itself establish liability.
The injured party must connect the defendant’s legally wrongful conduct to the injury and the damages being claimed.
How Ohio’s Comparative Negligence Law Works
Ohio follows a modified comparative negligence rule under Ohio Revised Code Section 2315.33.
An injured person may recover compensatory damages when their percentage of fault is not greater than the combined fault of the other responsible parties, but the damages are reduced according to the injured person’s share of responsibility.
For example, a plaintiff who establishes $100,000 in compensatory damages but is found 20% responsible would generally recover $80,000.
If the plaintiff’s percentage of fault is greater than the combined fault of the other responsible parties, recovery is barred.
Comparative negligence can arise in many types of personal injury claims.
A driver who was rear-ended may still face an argument that their own actions contributed to the collision, while a person injured on another person’s property may be accused of failing to notice or avoid a hazardous condition.
An insurance company may assign percentages of fault while evaluating a claim, but that assessment does not conclusively determine legal responsibility.
If a comparative-fault dispute reaches a jury trial, the jury determines the percentages of fault attributable to the parties and other responsible persons. In a nonjury case, the court makes those findings.
Because the allocation of fault directly affects the amount an injured person can recover, an Ohio personal injury attorney can gather evidence concerning how the accident occurred and challenge unsupported attempts to shift responsibility to the injured person.